- Font Size:
- Default font size
- Larger font size
BY CHRISTINE KRALY
ckraly@nwitimes.com | Wednesday, July 09, 2008 | (22 comment(s))
HAMMOND | Environmentalists are taking another swing at BP’s new Whiting plant air permit, this time by suing the company in federal court.
PDF: Read the suit
The Natural Resources Defense Council filed a suit Wednesday against BP in federal court in Hammond for violations of the Clean Air Act, according to the NRDC.
The group’s lawsuit focuses primarily on three new flares -- the large torch structures used to relieve pressure in the refinery – planned as part of the refinery’s $3.8 billion expansion.
The NRDC has alleged BP’s air permit does not properly account for any increased pollution from the flares, and has criticized the Indiana Department of Environmental Management for being too lax in BP’s permitting.
BP and IDEM have defended the permit as legal and protective of the environment. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency recently upheld the IDEM-backed permit, allowing BP to continue building its expansion.
In a statement, NRDC senior attorney Ann Alexander said, “Flares are enormous sources of pollution. That pollution may be a little harder to count than some other types of pollution, but you still have to do it. It’s not an option for BP and IDEM to stick their heads in the sand and act like the problem does not exist.”
Alexander continued: “IDEM and BP did not learn their lesson after the public outcry over water pollution permits last summer. They had an opportunity to do things right this time, and they didn’t take it,” said Ann Alexander, a senior attorney at NRDC. “The permits simply do not protect the public and do not live up to the law. The failure of Indiana and BP to take the public interest and the law seriously has forced the issue and required that this case be brought before the federal courts.”
The NRDC is assisting other groups that have filed appeals of the air permit with the Indiana Office of Environmental Adjudication.
Back to story 22 comment(s)
- It wasn't clear, concise or focused on the topic in the story.
- It was a personal attack, vulgar, explicit or degrading, used actual or implied profanity or contained potentially libelous statements.
- It accused someone of being guilty of a crime.
- It promoted violence or illegal acts.
- It contained telephone numbers or street addresses, or e-mail addresses and links to Web sites other than nwi.com or government agencies.
In no way do these comments represent the views of The Times or Lee Enterprises.
Passionate views, pointed criticism and critical thinking are welcome. Name-calling, crude and profane language and personal abuse are not welcome.
Reader comments will not be edited - they will be approved or declined. They may be used in the print edition of the newspaper.
If you feel a posted comment has violated these guidelines, please email our New Media team the commenter's name, the comment and a link to the article.
For more information please read our Terms of Service.
Post a comment Once your comments are approved, they will appear here.
» More Breaking News Stories


VPG wrote on Jul 12, 2008 8:03 AM:
face the facts wrote on Jul 9, 2008 8:11 PM:
Personly I hope BP sues NRDC when they win to recupe their losses insted of passing the cost onto us.
Remember there are more people driving every day it takes more gas than it did 40 years ago. "
marinauser wrote on Jul 9, 2008 4:55 PM:
JTV wrote on Jul 9, 2008 4:42 PM:
new generation wrote on Jul 9, 2008 4:30 PM:
Not a BP Guy wrote on Jul 9, 2008 4:25 PM:
BP gay... wrote on Jul 9, 2008 4:05 PM:
I can tell that you live out of the little city by the lake - and far away from the pollution and the "blast zone". "
Read em Weep wrote on Jul 9, 2008 3:46 PM:
"As a result, EPA concludes that IDEM has adequately addressed the issues raised in our March 21, 2008 letter," states Pamela Blakely in the letter. "We have no further comments on the proposed Title V operating permit." "
nd BP guy wrote on Jul 9, 2008 3:27 PM:
Whiting resident wrote on Jul 9, 2008 3:11 PM:
sinnsage wrote on Jul 9, 2008 2:44 PM:
Sick and Tired wrote on Jul 9, 2008 2:40 PM:
Wet Hen wrote on Jul 9, 2008 2:35 PM:
Wait till that sand oil comes in from Canada,then see how you will like slogging ankle deep in goo and stinking like crude. Believe me the smell does go away with one washing
This is not light sweet crude they are planning to bring in.
BP is not a good neighbor. "
Not Anti-Environment wrote on Jul 9, 2008 2:33 PM:
RLG wrote on Jul 9, 2008 2:30 PM:
WAKE UP PEOPLE!!!! "
BT Girl wrote on Jul 9, 2008 2:29 PM:
BP guy wrote on Jul 9, 2008 2:28 PM:
another BP guy wrote on Jul 9, 2008 2:16 PM:
Yawn....... wrote on Jul 9, 2008 2:14 PM:
bo changles wrote on Jul 9, 2008 2:05 PM:
Gas Producer wrote on Jul 9, 2008 2:00 PM:
BP guy wrote on Jul 9, 2008 1:48 PM: