Scientist: Belittling evolution has dubious origins
Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

BY BRIAN WILLIAMS
bwilliams@nwitimes.com
219.548.4348
| Monday, April 07, 2008 | (10 comment(s))

VALPARAISO | The Darwinian theory of evolution, because it has not been disproved by rigorous testing over time, has become accepted knowledge, and disbelieving it is not an option.

That was the conclusion of Murray Peshkin, a physicist with Argonne National Laboratory, in a recent talk on science and religion at Valparaiso University.

Opponents of teaching Darwinian evolution have lost the court fight to keep it out of the public schools, Peshkin said, so they have changed the battle to push for equal billing for creationism, or intelligent design.

"What's wrong is teaching those as part of science -- they are not. They belong to religion because their assumptions and their logic belong to religion," he said.

Dismissing science with "it's only a theory," Peshkin said, is "intellectually appalling" and a material threat to the country. Science in the 21st century offers chances to conquer diseases and achieve other advances, opportunities that could be lost if students aren't taught the best science and if parents aren't taught respect for science, he said.

Scientists have failed to explain the limits of science, Peshkin said. Science deals in what can be observed and measured through experimentation. Assertions or beliefs are not part of it. A theory, he said, is a hunch about how the world works that is then subjected to experimental observation.

Religion, on the other hand, accepts revealed knowledge. The two, therefore, take different approaches to reality, Peshkin said.

But each is valid and the conflict between the two is unnecessary, he said.

Peshkin said experimentation can only disprove a theory, but never finally prove it.

With proof always impossible, then, scientists rely on the repeated successful testing of a theory to make conclusions about the physical world, he said. Newton's laws of mechanics are accepted because they have accurately described observable phenomena consistently over centuries. They have been found to apply not only to planets, as Newton started with, but also to baseballs and jet engines. An airplane designed to fly under a different theory of motion would not get any riders, Peshkin said.

Disbelieving well-tested theories is not an option intellectually or practically, he said.

Since the 1900s, Darwin's prediction of primates' descent from a common ancestor through natural selection has been confirmed by repeated observation. The theory of evolution has been subjected to numerous and varied tests and has not yet encountered limitations, he said.

Previous Next
Email
Print
 

Back to story 10 comment(s)

Please note: Comments from readers will be screened and may not be posted immediately. If you don't see your comment perhaps:

  • It wasn't clear, concise or focused on the topic in the story.
  • It was a personal attack, vulgar, explicit or degrading, used actual or implied profanity or contained potentially libelous statements.
  • It accused someone of being guilty of a crime.
  • It promoted violence or illegal acts.
  • It contained telephone numbers or street addresses, or e-mail addresses and links to Web sites other than nwi.com or government agencies.

In no way do these comments represent the views of The Times or Lee Enterprises.

Passionate views, pointed criticism and critical thinking are welcome. Name-calling, crude and profane language and personal abuse are not welcome.

Reader comments will not be edited - they will be approved or declined. They may be used in the print edition of the newspaper.

If you feel a posted comment has violated these guidelines, please email our New Media team the commenter's name, the comment and a link to the article.

For more information please read our Terms of Service.

HaloBlu wrote on Apr 8, 2008 11:53 AM:

" I like FSM's comment... Well said. :) "

Mike wrote on Apr 7, 2008 5:42 PM:

" Evolution is "proven" because it has not yet encountered limitations. In other words, when those who believe in the theory of evolution found evidence that does not support a current presupposition the theory is modified to include that new "evidence". Which theory is correct, puncuated equilibrium or evolutionary gradualism? Did evolution happen in sudden burst or over long periods of time? There are supporters for both who believe in the theory of evolution, yet the reasons for their belief cancel out the opponents reasons. Or is evolution a theory which can not be disproven because everything proves evolution? "

L.Rosenquist wrote on Apr 7, 2008 4:42 PM:

" I can't believe that there are so many naive people in this world. We were made to believe in this God so we'd behave. We were out of control and acting like the animals that we are. The bible was written,based on some facts ,and alot of fiction. You can't believe everything you read. That is a fact! Please don't print email address. I'm sure I'd get alot of hate mail from these people that are supposed to Love one another. Or is that only if you think the same way they do? "

But you think like an ape wrote on Apr 7, 2008 1:55 PM:

" You are the naive one that can so calmly ignore 150 years of scientific evidence. You exhibit the same apelike responses as those that opposed the earth being a sphere and the sun as the center of the solar system. You must be very proud. "

BobC wrote on Apr 7, 2008 12:17 PM:

" Rich said "If macro evolution were valid then we would see variations of man in all stages."

The animals that humans developed from are extinct but we can see their fossils. The fossil record showing the gradual development of the human species is very impressive. It's fair to say there are no longer any missing links. Of course more fossils will be found, despite the fact most creatures completely decompose after they die.

It's important to understand the fossils are not even necessary to show evolution is a fact. New molecular evidence is now the most powerful evidence for evolutionary relationships, including our very close relationship to the other ape species. Please google "endogenous retroviruses" for more information. "

FSM wrote on Apr 7, 2008 9:27 AM:

" Let us remember that there are multiple theories of Intelligent Design. I and many others around the world are of the strong belief that the universe was created by a Flying Spaghetti Monster. It was He who created all that we see and all that we feel. We feel strongly that the overwhelming scientific evidence pointing towards evolutionary processes is nothing but a coincidence, put in place by Him.

It is for this reason that I’m writing you today, to formally request that this alternative theory be taught in your schools, along with the other two theories. I’m sure you see where we are coming from. If the Intelligent Design theory is not based on faith, but instead another scientific theory, as is claimed, then you must also allow our theory to be taught, as it is also based on science, not on faith.
"

ie0209 wrote on Apr 7, 2008 8:03 AM:

" relegion is theory, I am told to have faith in believing in an invisible man in the sky "

Read carefully wrote on Apr 7, 2008 7:51 AM:

" The Bible clearly states that the earth brought forth plants and animals. This is consistent with the theory of evolution. People were created by God, not through evolution, since we are spiritual beings. "

Rich wrote on Apr 7, 2008 6:19 AM:

" Macro Evolution is more valid than Creationism. If macro evolution were valid then we would see varitions of man in all stages. Further there would be a continued evolution among all species since the claim if Macro Evolution is that ALL species come from a single organisim.

If one acknowledges a living, perfect God, then why whould they think him incapable of creating us? Could He not also create all of the Earth and science itself? "

I AM NOT AN APE wrote on Apr 7, 2008 3:56 AM:

" Believe what you want people. If you are that naive to think we came from apes, I feel sorry for you and the reality that you will someday be faced with. "

Post a comment Once your comments are approved, they will appear here.

Current Word Count:
   

Marketplace